The second volume of this series on Legal Semiotics in the context of Legal Education suggested in 2013, that Lawyers are Making Meaning . Do they? And if that is indeed the case, do they create Meaning on the basis of their professional skills and needs only, or do they create Meaning(s) thanks to a broader and deeper insight into the philosophical dimensions of the Meaning concept? The fi rst possibility seems to be the case in general, and the second may therefore be in need of specifi c and more explicit attention. Not that there has never been previous consideration of meaning in sciences, law and legal discourse or in philosophy. On the contrary, the beginnings of the twentieth century provided far-reaching studies on the concept, which were also specifi cally different from the vested views of the seventeenth and eighteenth century characterizing the Anglo-Saxon dimensions of Occidental philosophy. Most heavily profi led was the interest in signifi cs in London, Amsterdam and other European centers and universities, focusing on the theoretical dimensions of meaning and sign .